Matthew A. Davis
Operations · Corporate Development · Design & Communications · Independent R&D
Published Work · 2019 — 2026
Two published specifications on semantic addressing, and a 2019 senior research project in industrial quality control. Most recent first.
Independent R&D · 2025 — 2026
Two published specifications on addressing meaning rather than compressing it. Written independently — no institution, no lab, no funding.
In 1679, Leibniz proposed the characteristica universalis — a universal symbolic language capable of representing all human thought through logical notation. The dream required infrastructure that would take 346 years to build: Malus’s polarization law (1809), Mueller’s transformation matrices (1943), Shannon’s information theory (1948), and the computational revolution culminating in transformer architectures and large language models trained on trillions of tokens. The semantic space Leibniz imagined now exists operationally, instantiated through large-scale statistical learning rather than formal symbolic construction. What remained missing was notation for specifying coordinates within it.
This paper presents Quantum Communication Theory (QCT) and its protocol specification, QComms — an application-layer addressing system for semantic space. Unlike traditional compression methodologies that reduce information density, QComms specifies coordinates — precise semantic locations that activate corresponding meaning constellations within the receiver’s substrate. Expansion is not decompression; it is recognition. The address activates what already exists.
Through a 15-week empirical study utilizing 29 specialized implementations across multiple platforms, we demonstrate 24–54% transmission efficiency gains (37% average) as a direct consequence of precise semantic addressing. Cross-platform validation confirms universal applicability independent of specific technological architectures. The protocol stack maps directly onto established OSI layers, positioning QComms as foundational infrastructure for semantic interoperability.
Results establish QCT as the operational realization of Leibniz’s 346-year-old vision: a coordinate system making meaning computable, transmissible, and universally addressable.
Translation Yare Native Distributed Addressing Language Engine
The protocol formalizes patterns that have emerged independently across human communication systems for 60,000 years: Aboriginal songlines, medical notation (Rx), ham radio Q-codes (QTH), maritime signals (SOS), and internet shorthand (1337, TL;DR).
This document specifies Tyndale, an application-layer semantic addressing protocol. Where traditional compression transmits reduced content (M → C → M), Tyndale transmits coordinates that the receiver expands locally (M → A, Σ(A) → M′). The receiver’s substrate already contains the meaning; transmission provides location, not payload. The selection formula tau = (M / S) x R x G optimizes for meaning preserved per signal spent (M/S), resilience across expression systems (R), and cognitive alignment with receiver processing (G).
Bandwidth-constrained environments — disaster response networks, degraded infrastructure, deep space communications — require semantic transmission under conditions where traditional compression fails. When every bit costs power, time, or lives, communication systems need a different primitive.
Taft’s teletype (1909). Voyager 1 (160 bps @ 15 billion miles). iPhone. Same protocol.
Tyndale is to natural language what DNS is to IP addresses.
The mathematics describes how meaning moves.
datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-davis-tyndale
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the IETF. They are valid for a maximum of six months, may be updated, replaced or obsoleted at any time, and are properly cited only as work in progress.
Concordia University Chicago · 2019
The senior research project for the Management Information Systems degree — proposing an algorithm over furnace data already being collected, to flag nonconforming material before it leaves the process.
The purpose of this project is to review and analyze current heat treatment industry quality control standards and systems to track nonconforming materials through the heat treatment process to better understand how an application might be created to identify and track nonconforming materials. Heat treatment process database management systems collect, categorize, and store data regarding a variety of the variables applied to finished materials undergoing the heat treatment process, such as: furnace temperature rate, carbon rate, RX gas rate, quench oil temperature, time tables in reference to each cycle within the heat treatment process, tempering furnace temperature rate, and washer water temperature rate. A composition and thorough analysis of this data in aggregation could potentially be utilized to create an algorithm to identify and detect when finished materials will not conform to quality control specifications after the heat treatment process. In order to create this algorithm, extensive research should be conducted concerning the heat treatment process, and the reasoning and rational behind the root causes of nonconforming finished materials conforming to quality control specifications must be identified. Once these variables have been identified and established then an algorithm utilizing the data already collected and stored within current heat treatment database systems can be created to track when finished materials do not conform to quality control specifications. Based on evidence, this piece utilizes archival and secondary data research to address concerns within the industry regarding nonconforming materials tracking through the heat treatment process and provides a proposed solution in the form of an algorithm and subsequent application to allow quality control technicians to interface with that algorithm.